I noticed a while back how “Global Warming” had quietly morphed into “Climate Change”. With ten plus years of no significant warming, it was getting increasingly harder to maintain the charade of continual warming. So how does the Global Warming industry continue to build bogus careers and justify billions of $$$ of government funding to continue their “important” work? Easy; they just re-brand themselves. Write this down: In a couple of years, if the weather turns decidedly cooler, these same people will still be claiming that carbon emissions catastrophically affect the environment, they will create data to “prove” that carbon causes cooling, and they will conveniently ignore all of their previous assertions that carbon causes warming…(OK, let’s be blunt…they will re-write history). And if you don’t believe this can happen…if you think our “scientist” are so competent, ethical and have such a high level of integrity that they couldn’t possibly do a flip-flop of that magnitude, just go back and revisit the 1970’s. During the early 1970’s, it was the prevailing attitude of our scientist that we were headed toward another ice age.
The morph from “Global Warming” to “Climate Change” was not the main point of the below PJTV interview with Chris Horner, author of “Red Hot Lies”, but it was slipped in towards the middle. Click on the picture to watch the interview.
There is a lot of good info in this video for anyone who is honestly looking for the truth about Global Warming and Climate Change. The major revelation about NASA in this interview? Well, Global Warming advocates have cited 4 supposedly independent data sets to support their agenda. Below is a list of the four, with a couple of comments gleaned from the video:
- Climatic Research Unit (CRU): (This is the “Climategate” one. Among other things: no one can seem to find the original data, and they can’t replicate it)
- NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS):
- National Climatic Data Centers (NCDC) Recently Exposed.
- A data set out of Japan
The main point of this PJTV video: Turns out that “the NASA data set was not independent”; in fact NASA was “just a modeling agency”, meaning that they just took data from CRU and NCDC and used it for computer modeling of the climate. So using the NASA data set as independent confirmation is bogus. An email from NASA to USA Today not only stated this, but also stated that the CRU was the best set of data that exist…only remember that the CRU data doesn’t exist.
Chris Horner notes that so far 3 of the 4 data sets that were used to support Global Warming have now been proved to be tainted, and that “Every single data set that we’ve gotten information about crumbles immediately”. This info in not surprising, it is just another piece of damning evidence that the data used to prop up the lie of Catastrophic Man-made Global Warming is data that is “at best, data that they can’t find, and at worst, fabrications”.
Watch the video. It is good.
http://www.pjtv.com/video/PJTV_Daily/CLIMATEGATE%3A_The_Global_Warming_Cover_Up_Spreads_to_NASA_/3230/